ArticlePLOS mental health2026
A comparative analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning models for suicidal ideation detection on social media.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicidal ideation is the consideration of self-inflicted death and has emerged as a serious and rising concern for worldwide public health systems, contributing to over 800,000 deaths annually worldwide. Individuals express intentions, distress, and thoughts of self-harm and death, thereby offering a crucial and unprecedented avenue for timely psychological intervention and surveillance. The core problem addressed by this research is the pronounced global insufficiency in detecting and mitigating suicidal ideation across linguistically diverse environments, specifically focusing on low-resource languages. Previous computational studies have primarily focused on English and other widely used languages, leaving a critical research gap for contexts such as Amharic. The main aim of this study was to investigate and to develop a robust and optimal deep learning model for identifying suicidal ideation in Amharic social media content. A total of 5,428 postings from social media such as Facebook and Telegram were carefully collected, manually annotated, and processed to provide the first publicly available dataset on Amharic suicidal ideation. After preprocessing, Word2Vec, GloVe, and FastText were among the word embedding techniques used for feature engineering. Five deep learning models and four machine learning models were then compared in this study. Based on the experimental results, ensemble learning models achieved slightly higher performance than the individual deep learning models in suicidal ideation detection. Specifically, hard voting ensemble learning models achieved the highest accuracy (83.3%) and precision (86.55%). CNN-BiLSTM achieved an accuracy of 81.45%, while the BiLSTM model achieved an accuracy of 81.4%, indicating that bidirectional sequence learning effectively captures contextual information in Amharic texts. Beyond its strong empirical performance, this study contributes a robust detection framework and introduces a public Amharic dataset, thereby establishing a foundational methodological resource for mental health research. Future studies should focus on developing scalable datasets and context-aware deep learning models that effectively handle multimodal data, multilingual transformer models, fusion-based features, and addressing bias in low-resource computational linguistics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.