Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42911942›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2026

Oral uracil treatment increases susceptibility to rectal SIV infection.

Elizabeth G Bodykevich, Fabiola Castello Casta, Jacob K Flynn, Charlotte A Nichols, Glenn A Nardone, Christine M Fennessey, Kelsie Brooks, Delmy Ruiz, Jennifer Simpson, Carol L Vinton and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth G BodykevichBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Fabiola Castello CastaBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jacob K FlynnBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Charlotte A NicholsBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Glenn A NardoneProteins and Chemistry Section, Research Technologies Branch, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Christine M FennesseyAIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Kelsie BrooksBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Delmy RuizBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jennifer SimpsonBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Carol L VintonBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Brandon F KeeleAIDS and Cancer Virus Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-1151
Jason M BrenchleyBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Alexandra M OrtizBarrier Immunity Section, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5835-9380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal microbiomes of men who have sex with men (MSM) are distinct as compared to non-MSM and may increase susceptibility to rectal HIV infection. We recently demonstrated that dysbiosis-associated disruptions to host antimicrobial immunity increase macaque susceptibility to rectal SIVmac239X acquisition. The described susceptibility-associated network identified Dual Oxidase 2 (DUOX2) - an epithelial sensor that catalyzes reactive oxygen species (ROS) production upon sensing pathobiont-derived uracil - as a likely contributor to increased SIV susceptibility. We hypothesized that intestinal, uracil bioavailability increases susceptibility to rectal HIV acquisition. Here, we treated rhesus macaques with oral uracil or uracil suppositories, prior to low-dose intra-rectal challenge with SIVmac239X. Oral treatment reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production from peripheral T-cells but did not perturb rectal immunologic transcripts or epithelial ROS production and did not alter biomarkers of intestinal damage. Although treatment with uracil suppositories led to increased concentrations of fecal uracil and indices of intestinal damage, there were fewer immunological perturbations relative to oral treatment. Despite limited evidence of intestinal damage, oral uracil treatment increased susceptibility to intra-rectal SIV acquisition whereas uracil suppositories did not. These data provide mechanistic insights into intra-rectal SIV acquisition and may lead to novel therapeutic interventions that reduce incidence of HIV acquisition.

Indexed as

RectumSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeSimian Immunodeficiency VirusUracilAdministration, OralAnimalsDisease SusceptibilityMacaca mulattaMaleReactive Oxygen SpeciesReactive Oxygen SpeciesUracil

Identifiers

PMID42911942
PMCPMC13690236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.