ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Strategies and approaches to vector control effectiveness toward the elimination of malaria in mainland Tanzania: An implementation case study analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective malaria control and elimination require continuous monitoring of vector control interventions, entomological indicators, and their relationship with malaria case incidence. This implementation case study describes data fragmentation and develops a unified, granular profile of malaria burden and vector control at the district level in mainland Tanzania. By integrating data on malaria burden, vector control interventions, and intervention coverage, the study complements existing stratification approaches and generates actionable insights to inform policy and strategic decision-making on effective interventions at the council level. We extracted monthly council-level malaria incidence data (2018-2022) from DHIS2. Insecticide-treated net (ITN) access was estimated using ITN distribution and population data through a stock-and-flow model, assuming a Tanzania-specific median net lifespan of 2.15 years. Data on indoor residual spraying (IRS) implementation and entomological monitoring reports (2011-2022) were reviewed. Rainfall data were summarized and visualized as overlapping monthly time series. According to the annual vector control report (AVCR) for 2021 and 2022, the mean modeled council-level population access to ITNs was 63.9% in 2021 and 65.2% in 2022. Across 184 councils, 17.4% had low ITN access (<50%), 59.2% had moderate access (51-80%), and 23.4% achieved sufficient access (>80%). Councils with ITN access above 80% consistently reported lower malaria incidence rates, whereas those with access below 50% were generally associated with higher malaria burden. Higher ITN access was associated with lower malaria incidence, underscoring the importance of accurate quantification and timely distribution of insecticide-treated nets. In areas where Anopheles arabiensis predominates, complementary outdoor vector control interventions may be needed to address residual outdoor transmission. District-level vector control profiling can enhance the effectiveness of malaria programmes by supporting evidence-based resource allocation and adaptive intervention strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.