ArticlePloS one2026
Predicting under-five child mortality in Zambia: Machine learning versus parametric survival models.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn sub-Saharan Africa, child mortality remains a critical public health challenge, with Zambia exhibiting some of the highest rates in the region. While survival analysis has identified key risk factors, these methods often fail to capture complex non-linear interactions and the dynamic, time-varying nature of longitudinal markers like birth intervals. This study aimed to develop and compare predictive survival models to improve risk stratification for under-five mortality using the 2024 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS).
methodsA cohort of 35,610 live births was initially identified, with a final analytic sample of 9,362 singleton births and 1,236 mortality events (13.2%) after applying exclusion criteria for maternal age and data completeness. We compared four modeling frameworks for predictive comparison: Cox Proportional Hazards (Cox PH), Lasso Cox regression, Random Survival Forests (RSF), and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), alongside a Bayesian Joint Model for inference on the birth interval and mortality association. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using Schoenfeld residuals, and stratified Cox models were employed to address time-varying effects. Model performance was evaluated using nested cross-validation with mother-level outer folds and time-dependent Concordance Indices (C-index) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) metrics across a 48-month follow-up period.
resultsUnder nested cross-validation, the four survival models demonstrated comparable predictive performance, with C-indices ranging from 0.745 (Cox PH) to 0.750 (Gradient Boosting Machine) and Integrated Brier Scores ranging from 0.095 to 0.096; pairwise comparisons across models were not statistically significant (DeLong's test: all p > 0.05). The Bayesian Joint Model revealed a significant association between the longitudinal birth interval process and the hazard of death ([Formula: see text], 95% CI: 0.023-0.048, p < 0.001), supporting the maternal depletion hypothesis. Variable importance analysis identified birth interval and maternal age as the most influential predictors of child survival, followed by previous child deaths. Stratified analysis of the Cox model revealed significant effects for maternal education (Secondary: HR = 0.426, 95% CI: 0.318-0.570) and previous child deaths (HR = 1.648, 95% CI: 1.529-1.777).
conclusionAdvanced survival modeling using joint modeling techniques provides deeper biological insights into child mortality dynamics, and machine learning and traditional survival models offered equivalent predictive discrimination and calibration in this analysis. These findings support targeted public health interventions focusing on birth spacing, maternal age, and enhanced monitoring for high-risk families as critical strategies for reducing under-five mortality in Zambia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.