ArticleDiscover nano2026
MHD analysis of tangent hyperbolic micropolar fluid flow over a permeable stretching surface.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This investigation analyzes the effects of micropolar tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow over a porous stretching sheet. Additionally, the influences of magnetohydrodynamics and heat source/sink effects are also considered into the analysis. The angular momentum equation is employed to examine the micro-rotation characteristics of the fluid flowing, whereas the enhancement in heat transport performance is evaluated through the inclusion of hybrid nanoparticles. These equations are subsequently reduced to a system of ordinary differential equations using suitable similarity transformations. The resulting nonlinear system is solved numerically using the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg 45 (RKF-45) method in conjunction with a shooting technique. The effects of relevant physical parameters are illustrated through graphical representations, highlighting their physical significance. Graphical representations depict the physical significance of relevant parameters. Validation of numerical results is performed by comparing them with previously published data. The main conclusions of the study are as follows: (1) a gradual reduction in fluid velocity is observed with an increase in Weissenberg number [Formula: see text], and permeability parameter[Formula: see text], while the surface condition parameter is fixed at [Formula: see text], (2) the skin friction coefficient shows a pronounced decrease as the permeability parameter increases [Formula: see text], (3) the wall couple stress exhibits an increasing trend with rising values of the micro-rotation parameter [Formula: see text]. Owing to the unique rheological behavior, tangent hyperbolic fluids are widely applicable in engineering and biomedical systems, where they facilitate controlled transport in food processing, polymer technology, oil recovery, and blood flow analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.