ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
Emotion Regulation Processes Related to Emotional Symptoms and Their Severity in a Clinical Primary Care Sample.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotion regulation (ER) processes have been studied as factors for the development and treatment of emotional disorders (EDs). The aim of this descriptive study was to determine how worry, rumination, negative metacognition, cognitive biases, and adaptive ER strategies contribute to the change in specific ED symptoms and their severity in a sample of adult primary care patients (N = 139). Different self-reported instruments were applied to assess symptoms and the use of the aforementioned ER processes. To analyse the data, Spearman correlations and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine relationships between variables. After multiple imputation of missing values, linear (parametric and robust) and logistic regressions were also conducted to assess the contribution of ER processes to emotional symptoms. Rumination was associated with the presence and severity of depression (***), anxiety (***) and somatization, whereas worry and attentional and interpretative biases were associated with anxiety and somatisation symptoms. Negative metabeliefs were correlated with depressive symptoms severity and associated with the presence of severe anxiety symptoms. Adaptive ER strategies were not predictors of any of the syndromes. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationships between ER processes and emotional symptoms and their severity. They support the view of ER as a relevant transdiagnostic factor in emotional symptoms, while suggesting that different ER processes may show varying degrees of specificity across symptom domains. These findings may inform more targeted, process-based psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.