Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42911500›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2026

Intracranial EEG for Detecting Epileptic Activity in Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Steven Smeijers, Mariella Segreti, Jeroen Gijs, Geert Meyfroidt, Bart Depreitere, Lauranne Scheldeman, Tom Theys

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven SmeijersNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. steven.smeijers@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-1022
Mariella SegretiDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5409-7409
Jeroen GijsNeurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-6874
Geert MeyfroidtIntensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart DepreitereNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7458-0648
Lauranne ScheldemanNeurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-3550
Tom TheysNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-3234

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen 11K8923NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen 1830722NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen 1843123N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) has been increasingly explored as part of multimodal neuromonitoring in acute brain injury, yet its diagnostic benefit compared with continuous surface EEG (suEEG) remains uncertain. We have performed a meta-analysis to quantify seizure and rhythmic and periodic pattern detection rates and concordance with suEEG. Secondary objectives were the assessment of correlations with brain injury, safety, and techniques. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched for studies reporting iEEG monitoring in adults with acute brain injury. Epileptic patterns were harmonized to the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Standardized EEG Nomenclature for Critically Ill Patients (ACNS) 2021 terminology, classifying events as seizures/status epilepticus (SZ/SE) or rhythmic and periodic/ictal-interictal continuum patterns (RPP/IIC). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and custom bias domains. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for (i) pooled proportions and (ii) pooled paired within-patient comparisons. Twelve cohorts (n = 864 participants) with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 343), traumatic brain injury (n = 351), and mixed etiologies (n = 170) were included. Six studies provided paired iEEG-suEEG data (n = 273). Techniques were based on a strip or depth electrode. No severe adverse events were reported. Pooled iEEG versus suEEG incidence rates were respectively: 26% vs. 15% for SZ/SE, 47% vs. 34% for RPP/IIC, and 57% vs. 37% for clinically relevant epileptic activity. Pooled paired analysis demonstrated that iEEG additionally detected SZ/SE in 16.5% of patients [pooled McNemar odds ratio (OR) 3.46 (0.51-23.6); I

Indexed as

ElectrocorticographyElectrodesInvasive EEGMultimodal monitoringSeizuresTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.