ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Dietary supplement use throughout the colorectal cancer disease trajectory: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDietary supplement use is common in the general population, but literature addressing supplement use throughout the disease trajectory in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors is limited.
methodsData from the COLON study, a prospective cohort among participants diagnosed with stage I-IV CRC, were used. Participants were asked to fill out a dietary supplement questionnaire at diagnosis (n = 1934), 6 months post-diagnosis (n = 1769), 2 years post-diagnosis (n = 1533), and 5 years post-diagnosis (n = 1198) containing questions on type, brand, frequency, and doses of supplements. Participants were considered regular supplement users if they used ≥ 1 supplement(s) at least once a week.
resultsSupplement use was reported in 43% of participants at diagnosis, 42% at 6 months post-diagnosis, 45% at 2 years post-diagnosis, and 53% at 5 years post-diagnosis. Multivitamins, vitamin D, and vitamin C were most often reported. Almost half of the participants (48%) with data across all timepoints (n = 1146) changed their dietary supplement use at least once during the 5 years post-diagnosis, whereas 26% were consistent users and 26% consistent non-users. The tolerable upper intake level was exceeded for 1-2% of vitamin D users, 7-13% of vitamin B6 users, 4-5% of folic acid users, 14-32% of magnesium users, and 6-23% of iron users. Across all timepoints, female and higher educated participants were more likely to use supplements. Participants diagnosed with stage III/IV CRC (versus I/II) and those receiving adjuvant treatment (versus not receiving) were less likely to use supplements at 6 months and 2 years post-diagnosis.
conclusionDietary supplement use is common among CRC survivors. Given the regular use of supplements, the potential impact of (high-dose) supplement use on clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.