SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Molecular-genetic mechanisms of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review of germline, somatic and experimental evidence.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are high-flow vascular anomalies that carry a considerable burden of haemorrhagic morbidity. Work over the past decade has shown that both inherited syndromes and apparently sporadic lesions can be traced to alterations in a handful of signalling pathways, but the relevant evidence sits awkwardly between human genetic studies, animal models, and molecular profiling experiments. To bring together the current evidence on the molecular and genetic underpinnings of cerebral AVM formation, clinical course, and candidate therapeutic targets. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus from inception to 1 January 2026. Records were screened, and full texts assessed, by two reviewers working independently. Studies were eligible if they reported genetic, molecular, or epigenetic data on cerebral AVMs. Because of substantial heterogeneity in designs and outcomes, evidence was synthesised qualitatively. Of 343 records, 44 primary studies (28 clinico-genetic and 16 experimental) together with 20 reviews and meta-analyses met inclusion. Inherited AVM syndromes largely reflected germline variants in the TGF-β/BMP network (ENG, ACVRL1, SMAD4, GDF2/BMP9) or in arteriovenous-specification regulators (RASA1, EPHB4); penetrance was incomplete and there was support for local modifying "second-hit" events. Resected sporadic cerebral AVMs often carried somatic activating mutations in the RAS/MAPK cascade-mostly KRAS, less often BRAF-at low variant allele fractions that demanded high-sensitivity assays. Endothelial-specific activation of KRAS or BRAF reproduced AVM-like phenotypes in vivo and showed MEK-ERK dependence. Susceptibility variants (notably at 9p21/ANRIL), inflammatory mediators, extracellular-matrix remodelling, and epigenetic changes appear to fine-tune lesion behaviour and haemorrhagic risk. Syndromic predisposition and clonal somatic events in endothelium converge on a small set of developmental signalling axes that govern angiogenesis and vessel-wall maturation. Diagnostics anchored in this biology, together with pathway-targeted therapy, now need prospective evaluation, paired with standardised approaches for detecting low-level mosaicism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.