ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Prediction of short-term and long-term responses to cladribine in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a Danish nationwide real-world study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cladribine is regarded highly efficacious in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, prediction of treatment response and optimal management remain elusive, particularly during long-term. We screened the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry for patients with RRMS who received ≥2 5-day treatment cycles of cladribine and were followed for >90 days. Annualised relapse rates (ARR) and activity parameters (relapses or MRI activity) were analysed from 90 days after the first dose (index) to year 3 (short-term) together with time-to-first 24-week confirmed disability worsening (CDW), CDW independent of relapses (PIRA), and activity/CDW (loss of "no evidence of disease activity", NEDA-3). Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests were validated in a subgroup who completed ≥4 five-day cladribine cycles before year 3 and contributed with >3 years follow-up (3YFS). Predicting covariables included age (< /≥ 45 years), pre-baseline activity, and short-term NEDA-3 status regarding 3YFS outcomes beyond year 3 (long-term). ARR declined significantly from ~0.55 in the year pre-baseline to ~0.23-0.25 from index to year 3. Younger age and pre-baseline activity predicted more frequent short-term activity. Pre-baseline activity additionally predicted short-term NEDA-3 loss. Short-term findings were consistent in 3YFS patients. CDW and PIRA were rare during short-term (~ 10%) and long-term (~ 20%), even in older patients. However, during long-term, NEDA-3 loss resumed steadily and this was largely unpredictable. While cladribine showed sustained short-term efficacy, treatment response appeared more favourable in older patients and patients without pre-baseline activity. Rare CDW and PIRA events warrant more research in cladribine for disability prevention. Optimal long-term management following cladribine treatment requires more research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.