ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026
The Evolving Landscape of Actinic Keratosis: Field Therapy, New Drugs, and Future Directions.
Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Actinic keratosis (AK) is a dynamic manifestation of chronic ultraviolet injury and a marker of field cancerization, but individual lesions and patients differ substantially in risk. Contemporary management therefore requires lesion-level triage, assessment of field burden, selection of a regimen the patient can complete, and longitudinal prevention rather than a uniform preference for either lesion- or field-directed therapy. This narrative review evaluates advances reported primarily from 2024 through June 2026. Recent evidence supports expanded treatment-area labeling and growing real-world experience with tirbanibulin; indoor and simulated-daylight photodynamic therapy (PDT); laser-assisted PDT; and low-irradiance, abbreviated-incubation, or simultaneous-illumination protocols designed to reduce pain. Short-course topical fluorouracil/calcipotriene has gained mechanistic and expert-consensus support, whereas diclofenac remains a slower and generally less efficacious option for selected patients. Nicotinamide, previously shown to be effective in immunocompetent patients, has not demonstrated benefit in solid organ transplant recipients, and systemic retinoids or capecitabine remain reserved for carefully selected high-risk populations. Senescence-directed glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) modulation, interleukin-1 pathway targets, immune checkpoint blockade, and human papillomavirus vaccination are scientifically important but remain investigational for routine AK prevention. A risk-adapted blended strategy-biopsy when invasion is suspected, lesion-directed treatment for appropriate confirmed AKs, field treatment when subclinical burden is clinically meaningful, and cyclical therapy to aid prevention and provide surveillance for high-risk patients-best reflects current evidence.
Identifiers
42911369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.