Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42911361›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026

Parental attitudes toward treatment options for primary teeth: a scenario-based study of caries, ınfection, and follow-up.

P Senem Özsunkar, S Duman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P Senem ÖzsunkarDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir, Turkey. pelin.senemozsunkar@gmail.com.
S DumanDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate parental attitudes toward treatment options for primary teeth using scenario-based assessments and to examine the associations between demographic factors and parental attitudes.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 240 parents of children aged 4-8 years. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire including three clinical scenarios (deep caries, infection requiring extraction, and follow-up). Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (p < 0.05).

resultsMost parents preferred conservative treatment (85.9%) and considered it reasonable (78.8%). The majority expected treated teeth to remain functional for at least three years (75.4%), with treatment success as the primary concern. Although 62.5% accepted extraction when necessary, 65.8% would seek a second opinion. High acceptance of space maintainers was observed (80.8%). Education level was significantly associated with treatment preferences (p < 0.05), whereas parental age showed no significant association.

conclusionParents demonstrated a strong preference for tooth preservation and conservative treatment approaches. However, treatment decisions varied according to the clinical scenario presented and were associated with factors such as parental educational level and previous dental experience. These findings highlight the importance of effective parent-clinician communication and parental education when discussing treatment options for primary teeth.

Indexed as

Dental extractionParental attitudesPediatric dentistryPrimary teethTooth preservationTreatment decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42911361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.