ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2026
Integrating Scalability and Equity into Hypertension Remote Patient Monitoring Program Design.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRemote patient monitoring (RPM) for hypertension combines home blood pressure (BP) monitoring with electronic transmission of BP readings and clinical support. RPM has the potential to improve BP control and reduce hypertension disparities, but because it depends on devices, connectivity, digital literacy, and sustained engagement, it may also worsen inequities if not intentionally designed. This review examines barriers to equitable RPM implementation and strategies to address them. RECENT
findingsRPM can improve hypertension control and extend care beyond traditional clinical settings, but its effect on health equity depends on program design. Equity should be treated as a core design principle. Future research should evaluate differential reach, engagement, effectiveness, and sustainability across populations and identify payment models that support equitable implementation at scale. Barriers to equitable RPM implementation occur at patient, clinician, health system, and policy levels. Key challenges include limited access to technology, language barriers, out-of-pocket costs, inadequate cuff sizing, unmet social needs, clinician workload, referral bias, infrastructure limitations, reimbursement variability, and the digital divide. Emerging evidence suggests that equity-focused strategies can improve reach and engagement, including provision of cellular-enabled devices, reduced patient costs, culturally and linguistically tailored support, team-based care, registry-based outreach, and routine monitoring of enrollment and outcomes across demographic groups. High-resource, low-resource, and hybrid RPM models each offer distinct advantages and tradeoffs in balancing scalability, sustainability, and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.