SynthesisCurrent urology reports2026
Novel Imaging Techniques Prior to Surgical Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of novel imaging modalities in working up invasive bladder cancer prior to surgical management and their potential role in guiding treatment decisions. RECENT
findingsMultiple new imaging modalities, including VI-RADS and Biparametric MRI have been developed to better guide management of invasive bladder cancer. There lacks a comprehensive review of these modalities and their diagnostic performance. We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched through 2025. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of novel imaging for muscle invasion detection or nodal staging were included. Quality assessment used the QUADAS 2 tool. Thirty three studies encompassing 4,689 patients were included. Twenty three studies evaluated the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System for muscle invasion detection, achieving median sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 82% at a threshold of three or greater and 84% and 92%, respectively, at four or greater. Nine studies assessed positron emission tomography for nodal staging, with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography demonstrating superior sensitivity (23 to 81%) compared to conventional computed tomography (13 to 47%). Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor tracers showed the highest sensitivity (82 to 100%) with specificity of 82 to 90%. One radiomics study achieved 73% sensitivity and 84% specificity for lymph node detection. Novel imaging modalities demonstrate promising diagnostic accuracy for bladder cancer staging. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System provides reliable muscle invasion assessment with threshold dependent performance. Positron emission tomography with fibroblast activation protein inhibitor tracers substantially improves nodal staging over conventional computed tomography. Integration of these modalities may optimize patient management, including use or omission of neoadjuvant therapy and consideration for organ sparing approaches. Prospective multicenter validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911355What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.