ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Multidisciplinary perioperative management of robot-assisted renal surgery: practical considerations for partial nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery is established across urology, but its safety depends on more than console performance. Restricted access to the patient, limited tactile feedback, external arm collisions, phase transitions, and communication failures create risks that must be managed collectively. This narrative review summarizes multidisciplinary perioperative management for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and introduces a proposed practice-based framework. The framework was developed by integrating multidisciplinary educational sessions and case-based discussions with a narrative synthesis of relevant literature. For RAPN, shared understanding of tumor localization, vascular-control and ischemia strategies when used, tumor excision, reconstruction when required, and hemostasis enables anticipatory preparation. For RANU, teams should anticipate transitions among renal, ureteral, and bladder-cuff phases, including possible redocking and changes in positioning or instruments. Across both procedures, recurring multidisciplinary tasks were organized into five functions: PLAN, POSITION, PREPARE, PERFORM, and PASS ON. These functions are intended to recur iteratively at critical transitions and to support shared situational awareness, closed-loop communication, emergency readiness, and structured postoperative handover. The proposed framework has not yet been validated; prospective studies should evaluate process measures, staff-reported outcomes, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42911309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.