Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42911291›Full record

ArticleActa biotheoretica2026

The Organism as a System: Insights from Paul Weiss.

Daniel J Nicholson

Abstract readHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biotheoretica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel J NicholsonDepartment of Philosophy, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. dan.j.nicholson@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3413-1231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the remarkable successes of molecular biology over the past three quarters of a century, there is growing recognition that organisms must be understood as integrated systems if we are to fully grasp their most distinctive features. Yet considerable uncertainty remains (and, in some quarters, outright skepticism) about how 'systems thinking' can actually deepen our understanding of organisms-beyond simply reminding us of such familiar maxims as 'the whole is more than the sum of its parts'. In this paper, I draw on the largely forgotten organicist ideas of the experimental and theoretical biologist Paul Weiss (1898-1989) to outline a workable, intuitive, and non-formal systems-oriented conception of the organism, and proceed to illustrate its value and effectiveness across a range of explanatory contexts. Specifically, I argue that a proper understanding of the organism as a system-lucidly anticipated by Weiss more than half a century ago-provides the necessary conceptual resources to diagnose and overcome the problems with four prominent doctrines that remain deeply entrenched in contemporary biology: reductionism, genocentrism, determinism, and mechanicism.

Indexed as

Systems BiologyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansDeterminismGenocentrismMechanicismOrganicismReductionismSystems thinking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.