ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Unintended Pregnancies and Breastfeeding Studies during Central Nervous System Drug Development: How Are they Handled, Is There Room for Improvement?: Maintaining the Gap: Pregnancy and Breastfeeding in CNS Clinical Trials.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnant and breastfeeding individuals are routinely excluded from clinical drug development, creating persistent evidence gaps in pharmacology, safety, and dosing. Despite mandatory contraception and pregnancy testing, unintended pregnancies occur, particularly during the development of central nervous system (CNS) medicines used by women of reproductive age. Once exposure to an investigational medicinal product (IMP) has occurred, these pregnancies may provide valuable prospective human data; however, treatment or trial participation is often discontinued and follow-up may be incomplete. This study assessed how unintended pregnancies and breastfeeding data were reported, managed, and evaluated in clinical trials supporting marketing authorization applications (MAAs) for CNS products. We reviewed 35 MAAs for centrally authorized CNS products submitted to the European Medicines Agency between 2012 and 2022. Pregnancy frequency, IMP exposure, pregnancy outcomes, breastfeeding data and regulatory comments were extracted from MAA dossiers, Day 120 Lists of Questions and Summaries of Product Characteristics. Overall, 451 pregnancies were identified, including 343 with IMP exposure. Of these, 108 occurred in pivotal phase 3 trials, resulting in 39 live births, 23 elective terminations, 17 spontaneous pregnancy losses, and 29 unknown or ongoing outcomes. Regulators raised 19 pregnancy-related and six breastfeeding-related concerns. Only one dossier included a dedicated human lactation study. Pregnancy reporting varied substantially in location, format and case-level detail, while 27% of pivotal IMP-exposed pregnancies had unknown or ongoing outcomes at assessment. More structured reporting and follow-up, including relevant exposure and pharmacokinetic data where feasible, could strengthen clinical pharmacology and regulatory evidence and support more informative product information.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.