Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42910407›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of mental health nursing2026

Adolescents' Lived Experiences of Social Media on Perceived Body Image: A Qualitative Synthesis of Evidence.

Isobel Whibley, Mark Pearson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isobel WhibleyUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3589-2773
Mark PearsonUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-3565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a transformational period in terms of the formation of identity and emotional development. Some quantitative research studies have attributed the growing instances of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviours in adolescents to the harmful standards perpetuated by social media. However, limited qualitative research has been conducted to consider adolescents' perspectives and lived experiences. This literature review aims to explore the lived experiences and perspectives of adolescents who use social media, and how social media is perceived as affecting body image. CINAHL, PubMed and MEDLINE were searched from 2013 to 2025 for qualitative studies investigating the impact of social media on adolescents' perceived body image. The quality of the included papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative research. Seven studies were included in the review. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, which generated the themes of Identity and self-perception, gendered experiences and Protective roles and external influences. This review found that participants in the included studies perceived unattainable beauty standards and societal pressures propagated by social media caused increased body dissatisfaction, self-comparison and self-objectification. For some participants, this consequently incurred disordered eating behaviours. It was concluded that adolescents frequently perceived social media use as having an adverse influence on their body image. Parents and school educators are key protective factors in mitigating this. Further research should be conducted to ascertain the potential for compassion-focused interventions in school curricula and body-positive content on social media, to improve adolescent body image and enhance media literacy.

Indexed as

Body ImageSocial MediaAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorBody SatisfactionHumansQualitative ResearchSelf Conceptadolescentsbody imagemental healthqualitativequalitative evidence synthesissocial media (SM)

Identifiers

PMID42910407
PMCPMC13688224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.