Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42910398›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2026

An Eight-Gene Metabolic Prognostic Signature in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Cross-Cohort Evaluation, Single-Cell Analysis, and Preliminary Functional Evaluation of PYGL and G6PD.

Wanyi Kou, Ruixin Guo, Yifan Zhang, Chensi Xu, Wenqi Sha, Yijie Chen, Yuran Lei, Ningrui Zhang, Kun Liao, Danni Liang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wanyi KouDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Ruixin GuoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Yifan ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Chensi XuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Wenqi ShaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Yijie ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Yuran LeiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Ningrui ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Kun LiaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Danni LiangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University.
Zhenxing WeiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University.
Zhenghui WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most prevalent pathological subtype of head and neck malignancies. Although metabolic reprogramming contributes to malignant progression and adaptation within the tumor microenvironment in HNSCC, its biological and prognostic implications remain incompletely understood. Objective: To develop and evaluate a metabolism-related prognostic score for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) across multiple cohorts, identify its cellular sources at single-cell resolution, and perform preliminary Methods: Metabolism-related differentially expressed genes were screened in The Cancer Genome Atlas Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma cohort (TCGA-HNSC). A total of 506 patients with survival data were divided into a training set (n = 355) and an internal test set (n = 151) at a 7:3 ratio. Training-only repeated nested cross-validation benchmarked 126 algorithmic configurations. Survival-SVM had the highest mean out-of-fold C-index, whereas an eight-gene LASSO + StepCox model was retained for interpretability and cross-cohort transportability. External cohort evaluation of overall survival (OS) was performed in GSE65858 (n = 270), while GSE117973 (n = 77), which used disease-specific survival (DSS), was treated as an exploratory cohort. By integrating 54,163 single cells from the GSE150321 and GSE172577 datasets, analyses, including inferCNV, 12 predefined metabolic modules, CellChat, and scTenifoldKnk, were conducted to investigate the cellular origins of the risk score and candidate regulatory networks; additionally, PYGL- and G6PD-targeting siRNAs were evaluated for their effects on target protein expression and wound closure Results: We developed a metabolic prognostic model that included HPRT1, ADA, PYGL, P4HA1, LDHA, G6PD, NT5E, and FTH1. The concordance indices (C-indices) were 0.638 in the TCGA training set, 0.651 in the internal test set, and 0.604 in GSE65858. In a complete-case clinical cohort of 473 TCGA patients, a model combining the risk score with age, sex, and T, N, and M categories achieved C-indices of 0.693 in TCGA and 0.677 in GSE65858. The corresponding 3-year areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.735 and 0.700. Single-cell analysis showed that the eight genes were distributed across malignant epithelial, proliferating, immune, endothelial, and stromal populations. The 16,240 copy number variation-high (CNV-high) epithelial cells had higher eight-gene scores and higher transcriptional scores for glycogen metabolism, the pentose phosphate pathway, glycolysis, and redox-related programs. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated silencing of G6PD or PYGL reduced relative wound closure at 12 h in TU686 and SCC25 cells. Conclusion: The eight-gene metabolic score provided moderate and cohort-dependent prognostic discrimination in the TCGA internal test set and GSE65858. Its bulk transcriptomic signal arose from several cell populations. Silencing PYGL or G6PD reduced target protein expression and wound closure. These findings provide preliminary

Indexed as

HNSCCmachine learningmetabolism-related prognostic scoreprognostic model.single-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42910398
PMCPMC13686788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.