ReviewCureus2026
Central Centrifugal Cicatricial Alopecia in Black Women: Diagnostic Challenges and Molecular Insights.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) is a scarring alopecia that disproportionately affects Black women but remains underrecognized and frequently misdiagnosed because of its clinical overlap with other forms of hair loss. Emerging research has expanded the understanding of CCCA beyond its clinical presentation, highlighting the potential contribution of genetic susceptibility and disruptions in fibroinflammatory and metabolic pathways. A comprehensive literature review of publications from 2015 to 2025 identified 15 primary studies, supplemented by relevant reviews and case reports, addressing diagnostic features and evolving perspectives on disease pathogenesis. CCCA typically presents as progressive thinning of the central scalp and may resemble androgenetic alopecia or alopecia areata. Dermoscopy and histopathology remain important for accurate diagnosis, with findings that may include follicular dropout, perifollicular fibrosis, and lymphocytic inflammation. Molecular investigations have identified several pathways of interest, including those involving peptidyl arginine deiminase 3 (PADI3) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ); however, their precise clinical significance continues to be investigated. Associations with autoimmune and metabolic comorbidities further support a multifactorial disease process involving genetic, inflammatory, and metabolic influences. Underrecognition may delay treatment and contribute to worse outcomes. Greater clinician awareness, culturally informed diagnostic approaches, and continued investigation of molecular mechanisms may support earlier detection, more individualized treatment, and reduced health disparities among women of color.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.