ArticleFood technology and biotechnology
Upcycling Fruit and Vegetable Pomace Powders for Technological, Nutritional and Sensory Enhancement of Cookies.
Article in Food technology and biotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research background: Upcycling fruit and vegetable pomace into value-added bioproducts is an effective strategy to reduce food waste while enhancing the nutritional quality of processed foods. Cookies, typically high in sugar and fat, are good candidates for reformulation. Experimental approach: This study aims to evaluate an integrated reformulation strategy combining the incorporation of whole fruit and vegetable pomace with simultaneous sugar and fat reduction in cookies. Three whole pomaces from different fruit and vegetable blends were individually used as partial replacers for oil (25-50 %) and sugar (30-60 %). The chemical composition, technological attributes and sensory acceptance of reformulated cookies were determined. Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were quantified in digested samples to assess the influence of pomace incorporation on the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds. Results and conclusions: Pomace incorporation markedly increased total, insoluble, and soluble fiber contents, with higher replacement yielding greater nutritional enhancement. Reformulated cookies also showed increased total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity in digested samples, indicating improved bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds. Technological parameters were moderately affected: hardness increased and spread ratio decreased with increasing pomace amount. Color changes occurred but remained within acceptable limits. Sensory evaluation by a trained panel revealed only slight reductions in crispness and overall liking at the highest incorporation of pomace, indicating that the sensory attributes of pomace-containing cookies were largely maintained. Therefore, formulations with intermediate pomace incorporation and moderate sugar and oil reductions (samples 25/30 and 50/30, where the first number denotes Novelty and scientific contribution: This study demonstrates that integrating fruit and vegetable pomace into cookie formulation with simultaneous sugar and fat reduction enables the development of a nutritionally enhanced product with moderate technological changes within acceptable quality ranges. The approach not only improves fiber content and phenolic bioaccessibility, but also converts processing residues into value-added bioproducts with functional significance. These findings provide a feasible pathway for designing healthier baked goods while promoting circularity and sustainability in food systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.