Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42910254›Full record

ArticleVisceral medicine2026

Outcomes following Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients ≥80 Years: An Analysis of the Prospective Pancreas Registry of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV|Registry Pancreas).

Philipp Scherber, Sebastian Holländer, Gereon Gäbelein, Dorian Igna, Peter Jacob, Andreas Pascher, Michael Ghadimi, Christoph Reissfelder, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Jörg-Peter Ritz and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visceral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Philipp ScherberDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral-, Vascular- and Paediatric Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Sebastian HolländerDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral-, Vascular- and Paediatric Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Gereon GäbeleinDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral-, Vascular- and Paediatric Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Dorian IgnaDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral-, Vascular- and Paediatric Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Peter JacobDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral-, Vascular- and Paediatric Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michael GhadimiDepartment of General, Visceral and Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Christoph ReissfelderDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan Fichtner-FeiglDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Jörg-Peter RitzDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, Schwerin, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of General Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Waldemar UhlDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef- Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Carsten KlingerGerman Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Haus der Bundespressekonferenz, Berlin, Germany.
Heinz BuhrGerman Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV), Haus der Bundespressekonferenz, Berlin, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment for General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jens WernerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7813-2482
Matthias GlanemannDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral-, Vascular- and Paediatric Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With rising life expectancy, the number of elderly patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy is steadily increasing. This study aimed to assess peri- and postoperative outcomes in patients aged ≥ 80 years undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, using data from the DGAV|registry pancreas. Methods: All pancreatoduodenectomies performed between September 2013 and April 2024 and recorded in the DGAV|registry pancreas were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: <80 and ≥80 years. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were compared. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Results: Out of 12,305 pancreatoduodenectomies, 1,566 (12.7%) were performed in patients aged ≥ 80 years. The proportion of very elderly patients more than doubled from 6.9% in 2014 to a peak of 17.3% in 2021. Malignant diseases, particularly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, were more common in this group. While overall complication rates were slightly higher in the elderly (64.0% vs. 60.7%, Conclusion: Chronological age ≥ 80 years is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. However, age alone should not be considered an exclusion criterion. Careful patient selection, taking biological age, comorbidities, and functional status into account, is essential. Integrating geriatric expertise and prehabilitation strategies may improve outcomes in this growing patient population.

Indexed as

DGAVMortalityOctogenariansPancreas registryPancreatoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID42910254
PMCPMC13685811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.