ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2026
Routine MRI in Pediatric Scoliosis: A Narrative Review of Risk-Stratified and Abbreviated Protocols.
Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the reference standard for detecting neural axis abnormalities (NAA) in children with presumed idiopathic scoliosis, but whether MRI should be used routinely or selectively remains debated. This SANRA-guided narrative review used structured searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, last run on July 19, 2026, to examine NAA prevalence, the performance of clinical and radiographic predictors, risk-stratified imaging, abbreviated MRI, and the consequences of imaging. Large series and pooled analyses report NAA in approximately 8-10% of presumed idiopathic cases, with higher prevalence in early-onset, congenital, and neurologically abnormal presentations. No single predictor, including left thoracic curvature or abnormal abdominal reflexes, reliably excludes intraspinal pathology. We propose a two-axis strategy that reframes the question from whether to image to when, for whom, and in what form. Axis 1 is PACE (Presentation age, Anatomic etiology, Curve characteristics, Examination), a literature-derived, rule-based, unvalidated framework in which the highest-risk finding determines a high-, intermediate-, or low-risk tier; some thresholds are expert assumptions. Axis 2 is protocol intensity: early full whole-spine MRI, abbreviated first-line MRI, or surveillance with predefined escalation. Evidence for abbreviated MRI is limited to one small retrospective single-center early-onset scoliosis cohort (n = 50), in which limited sagittal sequences identified all 10 NAA detected on full MRI with an estimated 68% shorter acquisition; diagnostic accuracy, anesthesia savings, and cost effects remain unproven. PACE is not a clinical prediction rule or guideline. The conceptual contribution of this review is to separate two decisions that are usually conflated, who should be imaged (risk stratification) and in what form (protocol intensity); both axes, and artificial-intelligence triage, require prospective multicenter and external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.