ArticleJournal for the scientific study of religion2026
Religiosity and the Pathway to a Non-Marital Penile-Vaginal Sexual Relationship during the Transition to Adulthood.
Article in Journal for the scientific study of religion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of religion and nonmarital sexual behavior often focus on the timing of sexual debut and number of sexual partners during adolescence, limiting understanding of how religion shapes subsequent pathways into and through romantic and sexual relationships during the transition to adulthood. We adopt a multidimensional approach to both sexual behavior (time in nonmarital relationships, transition to first penile-vaginal sex within nonmarital relationships, and subsequent sexual frequency) and religiosity (public and private) using 2.5 years of weekly data on intimate relationships and penile-vaginal sex among 933 women aged 18-22. Religiously conservative respondents and frequent service attenders delayed sexual transitions and were more likely to be in committed relationships, and frequent attenders were also less likely to be in coresident relationships. Young women who believed in God were engaged more than their peers, and those who prayed alone had less frequent sex. Overall, public forms of religiosity (religious conservatism and service attendance) were more strongly associated with more publicly observable relationship processes, whereas private religiosity (frequent prayer) was more closely related to private sexual behavior. The association between religiosity sexual behavior was partially explained by adolescent sexual experiences but remained associated with these behaviors net of those experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.