ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
College mental health and the digital care transition: national trends in distress, help-seeking, and technology-mediated access, 2020-2025.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: College mental health burden increased during the COVID-19 era while university mental health services rapidly adopted remote and digital modes of care. The population-level co-occurrence of these changes has rarely been described across the pandemic and post-pandemic period. Methods: We performed a secondary ecological trend analysis of seven publicly available, weighted Healthy Minds Study national reports based on successive independent cross-sectional samples from Winter/Spring 2020 through 2024-2025. The reports contained a nominal 553,785 response records across waves; they were not pooled as a single cohort. Harmonized outcomes included depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, nonsuicidal self-injury, self-reported academic impairment, treatment use, stigma, resource awareness, and selected digital-care indicators. Changes were summarized descriptively as percentage-point and relative differences; no across-wave significance tests or individual-level associations were estimated. Results: Depression increased from 37% in Winter/Spring 2020 to 44% in 2021-2022 and was 37% in 2024-2025; anxiety increased from 31% to 37% and was 33% in 2024-2025. Self-reported academic impairment of at least 6 days in the prior 4 weeks declined from a Fall 2020 peak of 28% to 16% in 2024-2025. Therapy use increased from 27% to 38%, treatment among students with positive depression/anxiety screens from 51% to 61%, resource awareness from 72% to 83%, and perceived public stigma declined from 51% to 36%. Among therapy users, remote-only care increased from 29% in Fall 2020 to 42% in Winter/Spring 2021, while in-person-only care declined from 35% to 22%; remote-capable care (remote-only plus hybrid) increased from 65% to 77%. In 2024-2025, 7% of the weighted national sample reported a mobile app, online platform, or other digital mental health resource as a provider/resource category. Conclusions: The observed national estimates show post-peak improvement in several mental health and functional indicators alongside an early-pandemic shift toward remote and hybrid care. Because the analysis used aggregate reports with changing institutional composition, these findings describe population-level trends rather than causal effects or individual recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.