ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2026
2026 Focused Update of the Saudi Heart Association Guidelines on Best Practices in the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) continue to impose a substantial clinical and economic burden in Saudi Arabia. Since publication of the 2022 Saudi Heart Association (SHA) CCS guidelines, important advances have emerged in diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, cardiometabolic risk reduction, antiplatelet management, and revascularization. This 2026 focused update selectively revises and clarifies key recommendations to reflect these advances within the Saudi context. Methods: A multidisciplinary SHA expert panel conducted a structured review of randomized trials, meta-analyses, and relevant international guidance published since 2022. Updates were restricted to areas with substantive new evidence or evolving clinical practice. Recommendations were formulated through expert consensus in accordance with SHA methodological standards. This document complements the 2022 guideline and does not replace it. Results and conclusions: This focused update advances a more personalized, risk-driven approach to CCS management. Diagnostic algorithms now explicitly integrate pre-test probability, reinforce coronary computed tomography angiography as the preferred initial modality in low-to-intermediate probability, and refine the positioning of functional stress imaging. Residual risk assessment and preventive strategies are also strengthened. Importantly, this update introduces a dedicated diagnostic and management framework for angina and ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA), emphasizing endotype-specific evaluation and targeted therapy for this historically under-recognized population. Anti-anginal therapy positions beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers as equivalent first-line agents, upgrades long-acting nitrates, and integrates ranolazine, ivabradine, and trimetazidine as evidence-based add-on options. Antiplatelet guidance emphasizes individualized dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), early de-escalation strategies, and selective use of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. Lipid management and cardiovascular risk reduction options are now expanded and revascularization recommendations are restructured. Collectively, these updates strengthen the delivery of contemporary, evidence-based, and patient-centered CCS care and provide a clear framework for implementation across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.