ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Parental perceptions of child and family mental health and behavioural adjustment following a mass school shooting in Serbia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Study examined parental perceptions of their own and children's mental health and behavioural responses among parents who were not directly or indirectly exposed to the 2023 school shooting in Serbia. Methods: The study sample included 1,927 parents. The questionnaire assessed pre-event child mental health characteristics and support utilisation, parental threat perception, emotional distress, functional disruption of daily routines, observed child emotional and behavioural changes, help-seeking behaviour, and perceived access to mental health support. Results: Prior to the shooting, 11.7% of children had a psychiatric diagnosis. Following the shooting, 85.2% of parents reported moderate-to-high concern for child safety, 38.7% reported marked difficulty sending children back to school, and 48.0% reported difficulty controlling intrusive thoughts about child victimization. Most parents observed no emotional or behavioural changes in their children; this finding should be interpreted as an absence of parent-observed changes rather than clinically defined resilience, given the reliance on parental report alone. However, children with pre-existing difficulties showed significantly higher rates of post-event worsening. Mothers reported greater distress and impairment than fathers across all domains. Post-event utilisation of formal mental health services was low (3.8% for children, 2.9% for self). Conclusion: Findings suggest that mass school shootings may be associated with substantial parental distress and functional disruption even without direct or indirect exposure. The gap between epidemiological estimates and low pre-event diagnosis rates raises concern about possible under-recognition of child mental health needs. Low help-seeking highlights the importance of accessible, non-stigmatising psychosocial support, particularly school-based psychoeducation, rather than formal clinical treatment alone. Findings should be interpreted in light of methodological limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.