ReviewJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026
Supraspinatus management in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures: current evidence and practical considerations.
Review in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become an established treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures in older adults. Although tuberosity healing remains an important determinant of post-operative rotational recovery, management of the supraspinatus tendon during fracture rTSA remains controversial. Because the supraspinatus is attached to the greater tuberosity fragment in acute fracture settings, preservation may influence fragment stability, reduction tension, and functional outcome. Methods: A focused narrative review was performed to evaluate biomechanical studies, comparative clinical investigations, and fracture-specific rTSA outcome literature addressing supraspinatus management during rTSA for proximal humerus fractures. Particular attention was given to implant design, tuberosity healing, and post-operative rotational outcomes. Results: Available biomechanical evidence suggests that preservation of the supraspinatus tendon may increase displacement of the greater tuberosity fragment, particularly in medialized prosthetic designs. Limited comparative clinical studies demonstrate no consistent functional advantage with supraspinatus preservation and, in some series, improved external rotation following tenotomy or excision. Across the broader fracture rTSA literature, tuberosity healing remains associated with improved post-operative rotation and shoulder function, suggesting that supraspinatus management should be considered within the context of overall tuberosity reconstruction strategy rather than as an isolated technical step. Conclusion: Current evidence does not support routine preservation or routine excision of the supraspinatus tendon during fracture rTSA. Instead, management should be individualized according to implant design, fracture morphology, reduction tension, and tuberosity fixation strategy, with the primary objective of optimizing tuberosity healing and post-operative rotational recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.