Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909969›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2026

Early micro- and nanoscale microglial responses to blood-brain barrier modulation by transcranial focused ultrasound.

Elisa Gonçalves de Andrade, Jared VanderZwaag, Rikke Hahn Kofoed, Katherine Picard, Keelin Henderson Pekarik, Micaël Carrier, Fernando González Ibáñez, Mohammadparsa Khakpour, Kullervo Hynynen, Isabelle Aubert and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elisa Gonçalves de AndradeNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Jared VanderZwaagNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Rikke Hahn KofoedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Katherine PicardSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Keelin Henderson PekarikSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Micaël CarrierSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Fernando González IbáñezSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Mohammadparsa KhakpourSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Kullervo HynynenTemerty Chair in Focused Ultrasound Research, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Isabelle AubertBiological Sciences, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marie-Ève TremblaySchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modulation of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) using transcranial focused ultrasound with intravenous microbubbles (FUS) has progressed to clinical trials. Guided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), FUS significantly increases local BBB permeability for approximately 6-24 h in mice, with an ensuing mild inflammation. Microglia, as the immune cells of the brain, are stimulated by FUS-BBB modulation, although the timing and nature of their responses remain unclear. In this study, we characterized the cellular (i.e., density, distribution, and morphology) and subcellular (i.e., ultrastructure) microglial alterations early after FUS-BBB modulation. Methods: We targeted the hippocampi of adult, male mice with MRI-guided FUS in the presence of intravenous microbubbles. At 1 h and 24 h after FUS-BBB modulation, we investigated i) the density and distribution of ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1)-positive ( Results: Microglial density and distribution were unchanged at 1 h and 24 h. However, FUS-BBB modulation was associated with elongated microglial cell bodies at both time points. At 1 h, microglia shifted to compact shapes with stubby processes, whereas at 24 h, they were larger, with fewer processes. At the nanoscale, microglia preserved interactions with blood vessels, but they increased their contacts with swollen astrocytic endfeet at 1 h and 24 h. By 24 h after FUS-BBB, microglia contacted pre-synaptic elements and extracellular space pockets less frequently, with ultrastructural indications of changes in metabolic demand and lysosomal activity. Conclusion: At 1 h and 24 h after FUS-BBB, traits of microglial surveillance were maintained, despite a shift in morphology associated with injury shielding in a subset of cells. FUS-BBB modulation appears to temporarily modify lysosomal, but not phagocytic properties, of microglia and to reduce ultrastructural indications of pre-synaptic remodeling early after treatment.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierMicrogliaAnimalsHippocampusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobubblesMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningblood-brain barrier modulationfocused ultrasoundmicrogliascanning electron microscopyultrastructure

Identifiers

PMID42909969
PMCPMC13684825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.