ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
BANF1 at the crossroads of genome stability and innate immunity: emerging implications for hematologic malignancies.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic instability and immune escape are linked features of hematologic malignancies, but the mechanisms that allow malignant cells to tolerate persistent nuclear and genotoxic stress while avoiding damaging DNA-sensing responses remain incompletely defined. Barrier-to-autointegration factor 1 (BANF1) is a small DNA-binding protein that bridges chromatin, couples it to nuclear-envelope proteins, supports postmitotic nuclear assembly and rupture repair, modulates several DNA-damage-response pathways, and restricts productive engagement of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) with self-DNA. Human BANF1 variants associated with progeroid disease and motor neuronopathy, together with functional studies in solid tumors, establish organism-level and cancer relevance, but they do not establish a selective blood-cancer dependency. Here, we integrate direct BANF1 evidence with disease-specific studies of replication stress, repair dependence, and innate DNA sensing in acute myeloid leukemia, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes, and virus-associated lymphoid malignancies. The evidence supports a focused question: whether defined malignant hematopoietic states require BANF1 more than normal hematopoiesis, and which BANF1 function accounts for that difference. Direct hematologic evidence remains concentrated in gammaherpesvirus-associated models and concerns viral reactivation and innate signaling rather than a demonstrated lymphoma-survival dependency. We therefore distinguish direct perturbation evidence from related disease biology and from mechanistic hypotheses, emphasize that repair regulation is context dependent and that cGAS recruitment is not equivalent to cGAMP production, and critically assess survival evidence, pharmacologic tractability, and normal-cell safety. BANF1 therefore remains a mechanistically compelling candidate for disease-specific investigation in hematologic malignancies, with selectivity, signaling context, and normal-cell safety unresolved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.