Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909944›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2026

Reattach-Informed Integrated Occupational Therapy In Persistent Post-Concussion Syndrome: A Pilot Case Series.

Sieto Reitsma, Aida Mehrad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sieto ReitsmaSieto Reitsma, Occupational Therapy Practice, Kollum, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8013-9084
Aida MehradUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-5709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Persistent post-concussion syndrome (PCS) affects a substantial proportion of individuals after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Persistent symptoms may reflect functional dysregulation - including altered autonomic and sensory processing - rather than irreversible structural damage. This pilot case series explored the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a ReAttach-informed integrated occupational therapy protocol on symptom severity, perceived stress, and functional participation. Method: Ten adults with post-concussion symptoms persisting more than six weeks post-injury received four 60-minute sessions over four weeks, combining ReAttach with occupational therapy coaching. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T4, week 4), and follow-up (T12, 12 weeks post-baseline; 8 weeks after treatment completion) using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ-13), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Data were analysed with the Friedman test; where the omnibus test was significant, Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank post-hoc comparisons were conducted. Kendall's W was reported as the effect size. Results: All measures showed a significant omnibus effect (p < .01), with large effect sizes (Kendall's W = .55-.83). Under the Bonferroni-corrected threshold, symptom severity was significantly reduced at post-treatment and at follow-up, and perceived stress and satisfaction were significantly improved at follow-up; the remaining pairwise comparisons did not survive correction. Satisfaction with daily activities showed a stronger overall effect (W = .83) than performance (W = .55). Post-hoc results are reported separately from the omnibus tests, and pairwise comparisons that did not survive Bonferroni correction are interpreted with caution. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that a ReAttach-informed occupational therapy protocol may be associated with substantial within-participant improvements in persistent PCS. Given the small, uncontrolled sample, the results are exploratory and require confirmation in larger controlled trials. Interpretations regarding autonomic regulation and predictive processing are offered as possible frameworks rather than demonstrated mechanisms, and any cost-related advantages are discussed as potential rather than established.

Identifiers

PMID42909944
PMCPMC13684852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.