Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909928›Full record

ArticleBelitung nursing journal2026

Factors associated with self-management behavior among pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus in China: A cross-sectional study.

Jiali Xu, Tatirat Tachasuksri, Punyarat Lapvongwatana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiali XuFaculty of Nursing, Burapha University, Chon Buri, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1987-9573
Tatirat TachasuksriDepartment of Maternal-Newborn Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, Burapha University, Chon Buri, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2143-9130
Punyarat LapvongwatanaDepartment of Maternal-Newborn Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, Burapha University, Chon Buri, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-0491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) poses escalating global health threats, particularly in China, with significant maternal-fetal health risks. Effective self-management is crucial to mitigate adverse maternal-neonatal outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the status of self-management behavior and its associated factors in pregnant women with diet-controlled GDM. Methods: A cross-sectional study recruited 160 pregnant women with diet-controlled GDM from the antenatal clinic of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from August to October 2024. Eligible participants were identified in the hospital's antenatal registration system and selected using simple random sampling based on assigned queue numbers. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires assessing SMB, GDM knowledge, illness perception, self-efficacy, social support, and perception of care received. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0 with hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Results: A moderate level of SMB was observed in 45.6% of the participants ( Conclusion: These findings identify potential correlates for further nursing interventions, suggesting that tailored, culturally sensitive education, family-centered support, and multidisciplinary care may be beneficial in supporting SMB. Such efforts should prioritize reducing anxiety while fostering knowledge, self-efficacy, and social support.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studiesdiabetesgestationalregression analysisself-efficacyself-managementsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42909928
PMCPMC13684837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.