ArticleBelitung nursing journal2026
Levels of stress and depression among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in Kosovo: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychological distress, including stress and depressive symptoms, is common among people with diabetes and may negatively influence self-management and clinical outcomes in primary care settings. Objective: To assess and compare levels of perceived stress and depression among patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 297 patients with diabetes recruited using convenience sampling from eight primary care centers in Prishtina, Kosovo, between March 2025 and August 2025. Perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), while depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Demographic characteristics and selected clinical parameters, including waist circumference and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, were obtained from medical records. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, with Cramér's V measuring categorical effect size. Statistical significance was set at Results: Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) were significantly younger than patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Exploratory item-level analysis of perceived stress did not demonstrate consistent differences between the groups; however, interpretation of stress-related findings should be approached cautiously due to the low internal consistency of the PSS in the present sample. Depressive symptom severity differed significantly between groups ( Conclusion: Significant differences were observed in depressive symptom severity between patients with T1DM and T2DM, whereas interpretation of perceived stress findings remains limited. Although these findings support the importance of psychological assessment in diabetes care, they should be interpreted cautiously given the cross-sectional design and methodological limitations of the study. Healthcare professionals, including physicians and nurses, should routinely screen for depression in diabetes care and provide appropriate follow-up or referral based on symptom severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.