ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Substrate secondary structure is associated with proteasomal cleavage propensity.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Why does the proteasome cleave proteins at some peptide bonds but not others? Prior work has emphasized sequence motifs, amino acid properties, and proteasome isoform, but the role of local secondary-structure context remains unclear. Here, we evaluate whether helix, strand, and coil context help explain proteasomal cleavage and whether such information can improve cleavage-site prediction. By mining a human and viral PDB structure corpus, we found that high-confidence predicted cleavage sites are enriched in beta-strand extended conformations and depleted in coil-like regions. We then trained a machine learning model using only secondary-structure labels, and benchmarked its performance against a sequence-aware baseline, other well-known predictors, and ensemble approaches using hybrid position-specific scoring matrices (PSSMs). Our proof-of-concept SSO-8 model was trained on secondary structure features predicted by NetSurfP-3.0 for 8-mer sequences derived from a diverse experimental digestion dataset of 20 substrate proteins. SSO-8 reached AUC = 0.649 on a held-out benchmark constitutive dataset and AUC = 0.737 on a held-out immunoproteasome dataset. A same-protocol sequence-only model reached AUC of 0.674 and 0.736, respectively, and paired peptide/protein-level tests found no evidence of a significant SSO-8-vs-sequence difference. Our model was also competitive with other sequence-based proteasomal prediction methods, using different training sets and architectures. Therefore, secondary-structure-only information captured substantial cleavage signal despite using much less input information than full substrate sequence, with the clearest support in the immunoproteasome dataset and hybrid PSSM analyses. These results extend the known preference for extended active-site geometry by showing an association between local substrate backbone conformation and proteasomal cleavage propensities, particularly in the context of the immunoproteasome, and suggest the use of sequence-encoded secondary-structure propensities as a measurable feature of proteasomal cleavage preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.