Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909884›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Esophageal Carcinoma Incidence and Survival Analysis: A Population-Based Cancer Registry Study in Central India.

Pravinkumar V Ghongade, Bharat U Patil, Anupama Gupta, Swapna Maliye, Nitin Gangane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pravinkumar V GhongadePathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Bharat U PatilPathology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Anupama GuptaPathology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Swapna MaliyePathology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Nitin GanganePathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to estimate the incidence, mortality, and overall survival (OS) of esophageal cancer (EC) and to evaluate the association of clinicopathological characteristics and treatment modality with OS.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using data from the Population-Based Cancer Registry (PBCR) in rural central India. The dataset included 545 incident EC cases registered between 2010 and 2019, of which 476 were eligible for OS analysis. Incidence and mortality rates were estimated, OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors. Prespecified sensitivity analyses, including metastasis-adjusted and age-stratified Cox regression models, were performed to assess the robustness of the primary multivariable findings.

resultsThe age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of overall EC cases was 3.99 per 100,000 population (95% CI: 3.50-4.47), while the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) was 3.29 per 100,000 population (95% CI: 2.94-3.64). The overall median survival was 178.33 days (95% CI: 115.49-234.48). The OS rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 31.3%, 19.7%, 17.4%, and 14.6%, respectively. OS differed significantly according to tumor site (χ² = 5.24, p = 0.043), treatment modality (χ² = 15.42, p = 0.031), and metastatic status (χ² = 162.64, p < 0.001) on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median survival was 232 days (95% CI: 159.59-304.41) for localized disease, 199 days (95% CI: 166.38-231.61) for regional disease, 68 days (95% CI: 54.21-81.79) for distant disease, and 28 days (95% CI: 15.56-40.44) for advanced disease. On univariable Cox regression, patients with middle-third tumors had a lower hazard of death than those with upper-third tumors (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.98; p = 0.036), and this remained significant after adjustment for metastatic status and in the age-stratified sensitivity model, while metastatic disease was associated with progressively higher mortality. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy were independently associated with lower mortality after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.28-0.85, p = 0.011; HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.94, p = 0.035, respectively). Age, sex, and histological type were not significantly associated with OS.

conclusionEC demonstrated a substantial mortality burden and poor OS in this population-based cohort. Metastatic status was the strongest associated prognostic factor, while tumor site and treatment modality were associated with survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy remained independently associated with lower mortality after multivariable adjustment. These findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis, accurate assessment of disease extent, and appropriate multimodal management of EC.

Indexed as

esophageal cancerhazard ratioincidence ratemortality ratepbcrprognosissensitivity analysissurvival outcome

Identifiers

PMID42909884
PMCPMC13684495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.