ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2026
Eluxadoline Utilization in Medicare Part D, 2016-23: National Trends, Geographic Variation, Prescriber-Type Patterns, and Spending.
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEluxadoline is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and has important contraindications that may influence uptake in older adults. Medicare Part D dispensing patterns remain poorly characterized.
objectiveThis study aimed to characterize national and state-level trends in eluxadoline dispensing and spending in Medicare Part D from 2016-2023, including geographic variation in population-adjusted rates and differences in dispensing intensity by prescriber type.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective repeated cross-sectional analysis using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Part D Prescribers-by Provider and Drug Public Use Files from 2016 to 2023. Utilization was summarized using standardized 30-day fills (primary) and claims (secondary); state intensity was measured as fills per 100,000 Part D utilizers. Geographic concentration and outliers in state rates were assessed using Gini coefficients and median absolute deviation-based outlier detection. Prescriber-type differences in dispensing intensity were evaluated with negative binomial models of claims with National Provider Identifier-clustered standard errors.
resultsThe Public Use Files contained 7826 prescriber-year observations from 3866 prescribers. National 30-day fills rose from 4410.9 (2016) to 19,860.2 (2018) and declined to 15,326.0 (2023). Median state rates increased from 7.3 per 100,000 (2016) to 43.7 (2018) and were 27.6-35.9 in 2019-23; California, Texas, New Jersey, New York, and Florida accounted for 39.5% of fills. State utilizer counts correlated with total fills (ρ 0.80-0.89) more than adjusted rates (ρ 0.03-0.34). Geographic concentration remained moderate in 2018-23 (Gini 0.307-0.352), and New Jersey was a recurrent high-rate outlier. Gastroenterologists comprised 41.5-57.4% of prescribers and had higher claim intensity than primary care (incidence rate ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.21). Inflation-adjusted cost per standardized fill increased from $1021 to $1414.
conclusionsEluxadoline dispensing in Medicare Part D is geographically concentrated and heterogeneous, with higher intensity among gastroenterologists. These descriptive benchmarks may inform medication-use monitoring, access and coverage evaluation, and future beneficiary-level studies of safety and appropriateness in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea care.
Identifiers
42909825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.