ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Japanese Patient Enrollment in Multi-regional Clinical Trials for New Drug Applications in Japan: Current Status and Related Factors.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) have become the standard approach for new drug development in Japan. However, no standardized methodology exists to determine the appropriate number of Japanese patients for MRCTs, and factors associated with Japanese patient enrollment remain unclear. In this study, new drugs approved in Japan between January 2006 and December 2024 using clinical data packages including MRCTs were examined. For the targeted products, the proportions of Japanese patients (JP ratio) in the MRCTs were calculated, and their associations with potential explanatory variables were analyzed. Among the 1621 newly approved drugs, 453 met the inclusion criteria. The median JP ratio was 8.9%, which was substantially lower than the 15-20% recommended in the Japanese guidance documents. Higher JP ratios were observed in studies with smaller sample sizes and fewer participating countries. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between the JP ratio and several factors, inclucing approval year, company type, orphan drug designation status, and number of participating countries. MRCTs are an established approach for new drug development in Japan, and marketing authorization has been obtained even when JP ratios are below guidance recommendations. Nevertheless, barriers to conducting MRCTs in Japan remain unresolved and may continue to reduce the motivation of emerging biopharmaceutical companies to pursue development in Japan. Japan has traditionally evaluated evidence from Japanese populations on a country-specific basis, in addition to evidence from the overall population. Greater clarity regarding the acceptance of more flexible development strategies would be beneficial in preventing future drug lag and drug loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.