Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909799›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Japanese Patient Enrollment in Multi-regional Clinical Trials for New Drug Applications in Japan: Current Status and Related Factors.

Ito Furukawa, Mamoru Narukawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ito FurukawaDepartment of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, 5‑9‑1 Shirokane, Minato‑ku, Tokyo, 108‑8641, Japan. Ito.Furukawa@sanofi.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6274-5982
Mamoru NarukawaDepartment of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, 5‑9‑1 Shirokane, Minato‑ku, Tokyo, 108‑8641, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) have become the standard approach for new drug development in Japan. However, no standardized methodology exists to determine the appropriate number of Japanese patients for MRCTs, and factors associated with Japanese patient enrollment remain unclear. In this study, new drugs approved in Japan between January 2006 and December 2024 using clinical data packages including MRCTs were examined. For the targeted products, the proportions of Japanese patients (JP ratio) in the MRCTs were calculated, and their associations with potential explanatory variables were analyzed. Among the 1621 newly approved drugs, 453 met the inclusion criteria. The median JP ratio was 8.9%, which was substantially lower than the 15-20% recommended in the Japanese guidance documents. Higher JP ratios were observed in studies with smaller sample sizes and fewer participating countries. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations between the JP ratio and several factors, inclucing approval year, company type, orphan drug designation status, and number of participating countries. MRCTs are an established approach for new drug development in Japan, and marketing authorization has been obtained even when JP ratios are below guidance recommendations. Nevertheless, barriers to conducting MRCTs in Japan remain unresolved and may continue to reduce the motivation of emerging biopharmaceutical companies to pursue development in Japan. Japan has traditionally evaluated evidence from Japanese populations on a country-specific basis, in addition to evidence from the overall population. Greater clarity regarding the acceptance of more flexible development strategies would be beneficial in preventing future drug lag and drug loss.

Indexed as

Drug approval trends in JapanEvolving Japanese regulatory landscapeJapanese patient enrollmentMulti-regional clinical trialsRegional patient allocationRegulatory harmonization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.