ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
An Agentic AI Workflow for Automated Macular Hole Diagnosis and Structured Report Generation.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCurrent AI models for optical coherence tomography (OCT) primarily focus on diagnosis as a standalone task. We developed and validated an end-to-end agentic AI workflow that integrates automated macular hole (MH) diagnosis from OCT images with structured patient-friendly report generation.
methodsThe proposed sequential workflow coordinated by a workflow orchestration agent consisted of an image diagnosis stage and a language generation step. The OCT version of RETFound, a self-supervised retinal foundation model, was fine-tuned for binary classification of macular OCT scans as MH or normal macula. Training, validation, and internal testing were performed using multiple public OCT datasets with patient-level stratified splitting, followed by external validation on two independent datasets. The performance of the fine-tuned foundation model was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC). For each new OCT image, the AI agent used the trained RETFound model to classify the image, received the diagnostic output, incorporated it into a structured prompt, and called the large language model (GPT-4) to generate the clinical report.
resultsOn the internal test set (n = 180), the model achieved an accuracy of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI), 97.9-100%) with an AUC of 1.00. On external validation (n = 1014), accuracy was 98.8% (95% CI 97.9-99.3%), sensitivity was 97.9% (95% CI 96.3-98.8%), specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.2-100.0%), and AUC was 0.999 (95% CI 0.998-1.000). Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) analysis showed that predictions were driven by relevant retinal regions, particularly the macular hole and adjacent layers. The end-to-end agentic AI workflow generated concise and standardized patient-friendly reports for all samples, without the language model influencing diagnostic decisions.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of an end-to-end AI workflow coordinated by a workflow orchestration agent for robust OCT-based MH diagnosis with a large language model for structured report generation. By separating image-based diagnosis from language generation, this approach offers a practical and scalable solution for virtual vitreoretinal clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909794What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.