Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909794›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026

An Agentic AI Workflow for Automated Macular Hole Diagnosis and Structured Report Generation.

Carla Troyas, Lorenzo Ferro Desideri, Neil Shah, Inès Schumacher, Martin Zinkernagel, Rodrigo Anguita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carla TroyasMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, City Road, London, UK.
Lorenzo Ferro DesideriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Neil ShahMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, City Road, London, UK.
Inès SchumacherMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, City Road, London, UK.
Martin ZinkernagelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Rodrigo AnguitaMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, City Road, London, UK. rodrigoanguita@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-1111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent AI models for optical coherence tomography (OCT) primarily focus on diagnosis as a standalone task. We developed and validated an end-to-end agentic AI workflow that integrates automated macular hole (MH) diagnosis from OCT images with structured patient-friendly report generation.

methodsThe proposed sequential workflow coordinated by a workflow orchestration agent consisted of an image diagnosis stage and a language generation step. The OCT version of RETFound, a self-supervised retinal foundation model, was fine-tuned for binary classification of macular OCT scans as MH or normal macula. Training, validation, and internal testing were performed using multiple public OCT datasets with patient-level stratified splitting, followed by external validation on two independent datasets. The performance of the fine-tuned foundation model was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC). For each new OCT image, the AI agent used the trained RETFound model to classify the image, received the diagnostic output, incorporated it into a structured prompt, and called the large language model (GPT-4) to generate the clinical report.

resultsOn the internal test set (n = 180), the model achieved an accuracy of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI), 97.9-100%) with an AUC of 1.00. On external validation (n = 1014), accuracy was 98.8% (95% CI 97.9-99.3%), sensitivity was 97.9% (95% CI 96.3-98.8%), specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.2-100.0%), and AUC was 0.999 (95% CI 0.998-1.000). Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) analysis showed that predictions were driven by relevant retinal regions, particularly the macular hole and adjacent layers. The end-to-end agentic AI workflow generated concise and standardized patient-friendly reports for all samples, without the language model influencing diagnostic decisions.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of an end-to-end AI workflow coordinated by a workflow orchestration agent for robust OCT-based MH diagnosis with a large language model for structured report generation. By separating image-based diagnosis from language generation, this approach offers a practical and scalable solution for virtual vitreoretinal clinics.

Indexed as

Agentic artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningFoundation modelsMacular holeOptical coherence tomographyVirtual clinicsVitrectomyVitreoretinal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.