ArticleHepatology international2026
Higher relapse rate after stopping tenofovir alafenamide compared with entecavir; but not tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HBeAg-positive patients.
Article in Hepatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background/purposeThis study compares the hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse rates after discontinuation of entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) therapy in HBeAg-positive patients.
methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort comprising 427 HBeAg-positive patients without cirrhosis who received entecavir (n=200), TDF (n=133), or TAF (n=94) were enrolled. All patients met the Taiwan National Health Insurance stopping criteria for antiviral therapy.
resultsAt 156 weeks, the cumulative incidences of virological relapse and clinical relapse, and retreatment were higher in the off-TAF group (85.3%, 73.7%, and 76.6%, respectively) than in the off-entecavir group (58.0%, 45.5%, and 38.9%, respectively) (all p <0.001). Compared with the off-TDF group (74.6%, 64.4%, and 58.8%, respectively), the off-TAF group showed comparable rates of virological relapse (p=0.139) but significantly higher rates of clinical relapse (p=0.042) and retreatment (p=0.003). The median time to clinical relapse was earlier in patients discontinuing TAF than in those discontinuing entecavir or TDF (17, 42, and 24 weeks, respectively). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that TAF therapy was an independent risk factor for virological relapse, clinical relapse, and retreatment compared with entecavir, but not with TDF; these findings remained consistent after propensity score matching. Among patients with clinical relapse, HBeAg seroreversion was more frequent in the off-TAF group than in the off-entecavir (73.0% vs. 51.4%, p <0.001) and off-TDF groups (73.0% vs. 56.8%, p=0.029).
conclusionsDiscontinuation of TAF therapy was associated with earlier and higher HBV relapse rates compared with entecavir, but not TDF, in HBeAg-positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.