ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Amyloid-targeted PET after negative or low-grade bone scintigraphy for cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess myocardial positron emission tomography (PET) positivity after negative or low-grade bone scintigraphy, while distinguishing test discordance from independently confirmed cardiac amyloidosis. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched through 5 August 2026, with targeted source assessment through 2 October 2026. Negative and low-grade imaging denoted Perugini grades 0 and 1, respectively; study-defined negative results were described separately. Eligibility required linked PET and bone-scan results with an extractable denominator. Acquisition modality, PET thresholds and cardiac reference standards were examined. A restricted synthesis required documented tomographic acquisition; a broader three-report synthesis was exploratory. Nine reports provided extractable paired results. In the hereditary transthyretin subgroup examined with carbon-11 Pittsburgh compound B, 20/23 participants were PET-positive after excluding one acquired, domino-transplant case. The exploratory pooled proportion was 87.0% (95% profile-likelihood confidence interval, 68.5-97.8%). Restriction to clearly documented cohort-wide tomography retained only two reports, precluding the planned pooled analysis. Uptake definitions and cardiac verification differed substantially. General diagnostic studies without complete bone-grade denominators, including REVEAL, were excluded from the eligible synthesis and retained as context. PET positivity is common in selected hereditary transthyretin cohorts with negative or low-grade bone scans, but does not establish cardiac amyloidosis or earlier diagnosis. Conditional diagnostic accuracy remains unresolved. Prospective paired studies require tomographic localization, tracer-specific thresholds and independent cardiac verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909723What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.