ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
Is Narrative Enhancement Possible in Healthy Aging? A Preliminary Investigation into the Effects of Advanced Training Activities.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, age-related declines have been documented in both the micro- and macrolinguistic aspects of language processing, adversely affecting discourse production in older adults. The present study investigated the potential for enhancing narrative abilities in healthy aging through the Advanced Cognitive Pragmatic Treatment (Advanced-CPT), an intervention designed to improve narrative and communicative abilities by targeting multiple aspects of social interaction. Nineteen healthy Italian-speaking adults aged 65-86 years participated in the program, which consisted of nine sessions lasting approximately 90 min each. Narrative assessments were conducted before training (T0), immediately after training (T1), and at a three-month follow-up (T2) using standardized tasks based on two single‑scene pictures and two cartoon‑sequence stories, administered individually to each participant. Oral productions were transcribed and analyzed using multilevel discourse analysis. The results revealed significant improvements in both microlinguistic and macrolinguistic skills, particularly through reductions in morphological and local coherence errors. Participants also produced more complete sentences and demonstrated greater lexical informativeness following training. Although total word production decreased at follow-up, this pattern was interpreted as reflecting more efficient communication rather than reduced productivity. Overall, the findings suggest that targeted intervention can enhance narrative abilities in healthy aging and support the potential of structured narrative training to promote communicative competence. These results provide new avenues for enhancing quality of life through structured narrative training interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.