SynthesisMolecular biology reports2026
Biomarkers and future directions for immunotherapy in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) have 3 interconnected levels, which provide information to guide different biomarker strategies. There is a critical clinical need, as objective response rates continue to be < 10%. We suggest a biomarker stratification model on the basis of clinical actionability. POLE/POLD1 mutations, recommended by the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Colon Cancer (Version 1.2025), represent true genomic "hard" indicators. While the benefit of ICI-containing combination regimens was predicted by the Immunoscore-IC in the AtezoTRIBE trial, the ANICCA-class II study recently questioned the value of anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Defects in homologous recombination repair HRR), ctDNA kinetics and subtyping of CMS1 show promise but need to be prospectively validated. TMB, however, has shown no consistent value as a single biomarker, and MSIs, such as transcriptomic signatures or PD-L1 combined positive scores, have not been proven to be useful. Future prospects involve multiomics algorithms that integrate immune profiling and stromal determinants, liver-directed sensitizing approaches and serial ctDNA monitoring of acquired resistance as viable strategies for further patient selection. These data collectively pave the way toward moving away from the "cold tumor" paradigm and toward dynamic, host-integrated testing for precision immunotherapy in MSS CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909684What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.