Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909682›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026

Acute Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit.

Carolyn Thai, Anis Dizdarevic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn ThaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH 5, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Anis DizdarevicDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH 5, New York, NY, 10032, USA. ad2689@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarizes current approaches to pain assessment and pharmacologic therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluates the expanding role of regional anesthesia (RA). RECENT

findingsContemporary ICU analgesia emphasizes systematic pain assessment and multimodal therapy while avoiding unnecessary deep sedation. RA provides targeted, opioid-sparing analgesia for localized pain but is limited by coagulopathy, infection, altered anatomy, and practical considerations. Fascial-plane blocks may provide useful alternatives in selected patients. Thoracic epidural and paravertebral techniques remain options for selected patients but may cause hypotension and clinically significant bleeding. Ultrasound-guided techniques, including erector spinae, serratus anterior, parasternal, rectus sheath, and transversus abdominis plane blocks, expand analgesic options. Continuous catheter techniques may extend analgesia when prolonged pain is anticipated. However, evidence in heterogeneous ICU populations remains limited, and much of the current evidence is derived from perioperative or trauma populations rather than general medical ICU cohorts. Further ICU-specific comparative trials are needed to define patient selection and clinically meaningful outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute PainAnesthesia, ConductionCritical CareIntensive Care UnitsPain ManagementHumansNerve BlockPain MeasurementAcute painFascial-plane blockIntensive careMultimodal analgesiaRegional anesthesiaRib fractures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.