ArticleMikrochimica acta2026
MXene-polydopamine-cyanobacteria photobioelectrochemical biosensor for atrazine detection in environmental waters.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A cyanobacteria-based photobioelectrochemical biosensor was developed for the first time using Synechococcus elongatus whole cells immobilized on a Ti₃C₂Tₓ MXene electrode modified with an electropolymerized polydopamine (PDA) layer. This surface created a biotic-abiotic interface that facilitated light-driven electron transfer for the sensitive screening of photosystem II (PSII)-inhibiting herbicides in environmental waters, using atrazine (ATZ) as a model analyte. The biosensor was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The detection strategy relies on the inhibition of PSII photosynthetic activity, which produces a concentration-dependent decrease in photocurrent. Under optimized conditions, the biosensor achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.92 nM (0.414 ppb), a linear range of 5-200 nM, and a sensitivity of 177.71 nA decade⁻¹ cm⁻². Interference studies demonstrated class selectivity toward PSII-inhibiting herbicides (e.g., DCMU, simazine, desethylatrazine), with negligible response (< 10%) from non-PSII pesticides and common inorganic ions. Regarding operational stability, the device retained > 95% for 1 day and approximately 93% at day 2. However, a 61% signal loss was observed by day 5 (stored at 4 °C), highlighting an operational limitation inherent to whole-cell biological systems. The biosensor was successfully applied to determine ATZ in groundwater, river water, and seawater, delivering accurate recoveries (99.75-103.9%) and offering a green alternative for on-site environmental monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.