Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909648›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026

Safety of in-hospital delay of appendectomy in complicated appendicitis - a propensity score-matched analysis of 1027 patients.

Lena Anthuber, Michael Hoffmann, Stefan Schiele, Gernot Müller, Andrea Mair, Florian Sommer, David Pinto, Matthias Anthuber, Katharina Beyer, Matthias Schrempf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lena AnthuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany. lena.anthuber@uk-augsburg.de.
Michael HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.
Stefan SchieleDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Gernot MüllerDepartment of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Institute of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Andrea MairDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.
Florian SommerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.
David PintoDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.
Matthias AnthuberDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.
Katharina BeyerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.
Matthias SchrempfDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, Augsburg, 86156, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAppendectomy is one of the most frequently performed emergency surgical procedures worldwide. Current guidelines recommend surgical intervention within 24 h for uncomplicated appendicitis; however, the optimal timing for patients with complicated appendicitis remains unclear. Recent studies suggest that in-hospital delay may be safe in uncomplicated cases, yet patients with clinical or radiological signs of perforation are usually excluded. This study aims to identify clinical and laboratory risk factors for perforation and to evaluate whether it is safe to delay surgery by 6 to 9 h in patients presenting with signs of complicated appendicitis.

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated appendicitis between January 2008 and June 2023. Perforation was defined histopathologically, and complications were recorded perioperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for perforation and complications. Propensity-score (PS) matching was performed to control confounding factors.

resultsA total of 1,027 patients with suspected complicated appendicitis were included. PS matching yielded two cohorts of 327 patients. No significant differences were observed in perforation rates (46.5% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.88) or complication rates (23.5% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.51). Logistic regression analysis of the PS matched groups confirmed that a delay of surgery of > 6 h was not associated with increased risk of perforation (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.75-1.41; p = 0.87) or complication rate (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.59-1.27; p = 0.47). A 9-hour threshold to surgery showed no significant differences in perforation rates (50.0% vs. 44.9%; p = 0.34) or complication rates (24.7% vs. 19.7%; p = 0.25). Logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate an association between a surgical delay of > 9 h and either perforation (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.51-1.22; p = 0.28) or complication rate (OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.17; p = 0.16). Age > 65 years, higher BMI, symptom duration > 48 h at the time of admission, elevated inflammatory markers, and suspected perforation on imaging were identified as independent risk factors for perforation. Higher ASA scores, male sex, suspected perforation on imaging, and elevated CRP levels were associated with increased complication rates.

interpretationA delay in surgical intervention of 6-9 h may be acceptable in patients with suspected complicated appendicitis without increasing the risk of perforation and / or complications.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisTime-to-TreatmentAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment DelayAppendiceal perforationComplicated appendicitisPostoperative complicationsPropensity-score matchingRisk factorsSurgical timing/in-hospital delay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.