ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Safety of in-hospital delay of appendectomy in complicated appendicitis - a propensity score-matched analysis of 1027 patients.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAppendectomy is one of the most frequently performed emergency surgical procedures worldwide. Current guidelines recommend surgical intervention within 24 h for uncomplicated appendicitis; however, the optimal timing for patients with complicated appendicitis remains unclear. Recent studies suggest that in-hospital delay may be safe in uncomplicated cases, yet patients with clinical or radiological signs of perforation are usually excluded. This study aims to identify clinical and laboratory risk factors for perforation and to evaluate whether it is safe to delay surgery by 6 to 9 h in patients presenting with signs of complicated appendicitis.
methodsThis retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated appendicitis between January 2008 and June 2023. Perforation was defined histopathologically, and complications were recorded perioperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for perforation and complications. Propensity-score (PS) matching was performed to control confounding factors.
resultsA total of 1,027 patients with suspected complicated appendicitis were included. PS matching yielded two cohorts of 327 patients. No significant differences were observed in perforation rates (46.5% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.88) or complication rates (23.5% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.51). Logistic regression analysis of the PS matched groups confirmed that a delay of surgery of > 6 h was not associated with increased risk of perforation (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.75-1.41; p = 0.87) or complication rate (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.59-1.27; p = 0.47). A 9-hour threshold to surgery showed no significant differences in perforation rates (50.0% vs. 44.9%; p = 0.34) or complication rates (24.7% vs. 19.7%; p = 0.25). Logistic regression analysis did not demonstrate an association between a surgical delay of > 9 h and either perforation (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.51-1.22; p = 0.28) or complication rate (OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.17; p = 0.16). Age > 65 years, higher BMI, symptom duration > 48 h at the time of admission, elevated inflammatory markers, and suspected perforation on imaging were identified as independent risk factors for perforation. Higher ASA scores, male sex, suspected perforation on imaging, and elevated CRP levels were associated with increased complication rates.
interpretationA delay in surgical intervention of 6-9 h may be acceptable in patients with suspected complicated appendicitis without increasing the risk of perforation and / or complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.