Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909647›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Molecular insights into the dehydration mechanism of 1,2-butanediol: A CBS-QB3 and G4MP2 study.

Marwah M M Madkhali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marwah M M MadkhaliDepartment of Physical Sciences, Chemistry Division, College of Science, Jazan University, P.O. Box. 114, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia. marwahmadkhali@jazanu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe present work provides a detailed theoretical investigation of the full dehydration mechanism of 1,2-butanediol (1,2-BDO) using Complete Basis Set-Quadratic Becke3 (CBS-QB3) and Gaussian-4 Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (G4MP2) methods. Bond dissociation energy (BDE) analysis revealed distinct differences between the two hydroxyl groups in 1,2-BDO. The terminal C1-O1 bond is weaker than the internal C2-O2 bond by 1.7 and 1.9 kcal mol⁻

methodsThe dehydration mechanism of 1,2-BDO was investigated using the composite ab initio CBS-QB3 and G4MP2 computational methods. The CBS-QB3 approach involves geometry optimization and vibrational frequency calculations at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level, followed by higher-level single-point energy calculations incorporating CCSD(T), MP4SDQ, and MP2 corrections, together with complete-basis-set (CBS) extrapolation to enhance the accuracy of the calculated energies. In the G4MP2 approach, molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies are optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(2df,p) level, followed by a series of higher-level single-point calculations using CCSD(T,FC)/6-31G(d), MP2(FC)/G3MP2LargeXP, RHF/mod-aug-cc-pVTZ, and RHF/mod-aug-cc-pVQZ levels. Fundamental thermochemical properties, including atomization enthalpies (AE), bond dissociation energies (BDEs), ionization energies (IEs), and electron affinities (EAs), were calculated for 1,2-BDO and the species involved in its decomposition. The reliability of the computational methods was evaluated by comparing the calculated results with available theoretical and experimental data. BDE analysis was used to assess the relative strength and reactivity of the two hydroxyl groups, while thermodynamic analyses were applied to compare the 19 proposed dehydration pathways.

Indexed as

CBS–QB3 and G4MP2 methodsDehydration mechanismPyrolysisTransition state

Identifiers

PMID42909647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.