ArticleSurgery today2026
Risk factors for stoma outlet obstruction after colorectal cancer surgery with diverting loop ileostomy: A retrospective single-center study.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is a notable complication following diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) for colorectal cancer. However, no definitive risk factors for SOO have been identified. This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with SOO.
methodsThis retrospective study included 167 consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery with DLI at Chiba University Hospital between January 2010 and October 2024. We evaluated the patient, tumor, and surgical factors along with the computed tomography-based anatomical measurements. These included rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) thickness, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) thickness, stoma penetration angles, penetration site through the RAM, and proximal limb orientation measurements.
resultsSOO occurred in 21 (12.6%) patients. A univariate analysis demonstrated that central penetration of the RAM (P = 0.01) and caudal orientation of the proximal limb (P = 0.02) were significantly associated with SOO length. A multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that stoma penetration through the central portion of the RAM was an independent risk factor for SOO (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI], 1.26-10.1; P = 0.02).
conclusionCentral RAM penetration was an independent risk factor for SOO. As the penetration site is a modifiable technical factor, avoiding the central RAM when creating the DLI may reduce the risk of SOO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.