ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Vaginal Canal Segmentation with nnU-Net Algorithm from MRI Defecography for Biomechanical Analysis.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisAccurate three-dimensional segmentation of the vaginal canal is essential for patient-specific pelvic floor modeling, biomechanical analysis, and the development of personalized intravaginal devices. However, manual segmentation of magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) images is time-consuming and prone to observer variability. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an automated deep learning pipeline using the nnU-Net framework for vaginal canal segmentation from MRD images.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 47 women who underwent MRD for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction were included. The vaginal canal was manually annotated on three-dimensional T2-weighted MRD volumes using 3D Slicer to generate ground-truth binary masks. A 3D full-resolution nnU-Net model was trained and evaluated using fivefold cross-validation. Segmentation accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intersection over union (IoU). Predicted masks were further processed using hole filling, marching cubes surface reconstruction, and Taubin smoothing to generate three-dimensional meshes and extract vaginal volume and surface area.
resultsThe nnU-Net model achieved high segmentation accuracy, with a mean DSC of 0.9714 and a mean IoU of 0.9675. Automated segmentation of a full 3D MRD volume required < 1 s, compared with approximately 30-45 min for manual segmentation. The mean vaginal volume was 38.74 ± 13.98 cm
conclusionsThe nnU-Net framework enables rapid, accurate, and reproducible segmentation of the gel-distended vaginal lumen from MRD images. This automated pipeline may facilitate standardized three-dimensional measurement of the visible vaginal cavity and provide geometry for patient-specific biomechanical modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.