Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909571›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Late efficiency gains in robotic-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an updated learning curve analysis of the first 100 cases.

Dilpreet Singh, Ivan Mansour, Kali Barnes, Sara Tuz, Mariano E Menendez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dilpreet SinghUC Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2536-4316
Ivan MansourUC Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, USA.
Kali BarnesUC Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, USA.
Sara TuzUC Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, USA.
Mariano E MenendezUC Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, USA. marianofurrer@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning curves for robotic-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are typically described over a surgeon's first 20 to 30 cases. Whether operative efficiency continues to improve beyond that point, and whether mean operative time is the appropriate measure of it, is unknown. We evaluated 100 consecutive primary robotic-assisted RSA procedures performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon using the Mako system (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) at an academic ambulatory surgery center. The first 30 cases comprise our previously reported cohort. Operative time, defined as incision to the start of closure, was modeled by segmented linear regression with a breakpoint at case 30. Variability was assessed by standard deviation and Levene's test, and the distribution of improvement by percentile comparison and by quantile regression at the 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles. Baseline characteristics were compared across case groups, and the influence of patient factors on operative time was assessed by multivariable regression. Mean operative time fell from 88.6 min (cases 1 to 30) to 75.4 min (cases 31 to 70) to 64.3 min (cases 71 to 100). Segmented regression demonstrated a steep initial decline of 1.85 min per case (P = 0.0001) followed by a shallower but significant decline of 0.26 min per case (P = 0.001), with a significant difference in slope between phases (P < 0.0001). Variability fell proportionally further than the mean, with standard deviation decreasing by 56.6% against a 27.5% decrease in mean operative time (P = 0.008). Improvement was greatest at the upper end of the distribution: the 90th percentile declined by 0.52 min per case compared with 0.30 min per case at the 10th, and percentile improvement increased from 17% at the 5th percentile to 35% at the 95th. The total range of operative time contracted from 115 to 42 min, and the proportion of cases exceeding 90 min fell from 40% to none. Baseline characteristics did not differ across case groups, and the case-number effect persisted after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index and glenoid deformity. Operative efficiency in robotic-assisted RSA continues to improve well beyond the initial 30-case learning period, but the way that improvement is expressed shifts from shortening the typical case to eliminating the prolonged outliers. Because operating room scheduling is driven by the tail of the distribution rather than its mean, case-to-case predictability of operative time may be a more informative marker of a mature robotic workflow than mean operative time alone.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderLearning CurveRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeLearning curveOperative timeQuantile regressionReverse shoulder arthroplastyRobotic surgeryVariability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.