Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909569›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Combined multimodal monitoring during neonatal transition in preterm infants: feasibility, safety and post-implementation evaluation.

Niki Oikonomopoulou, Maria Jose Rodriguez, Araceli Corredera, Cristina Cortés-Ledesma, Eva Vierge, Jose Martinez-Orgado, Luis Arruza

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Niki OikonomopoulouInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Maria Jose RodriguezDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Prof. Martin Lagos S/N., Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Araceli CorrederaDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Prof. Martin Lagos S/N., Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Cristina Cortés-LedesmaDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Prof. Martin Lagos S/N., Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Eva ViergeDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Prof. Martin Lagos S/N., Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Jose Martinez-OrgadoDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Prof. Martin Lagos S/N., Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Luis ArruzaDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC), Prof. Martin Lagos S/N., Madrid, 28040, Spain. luis.arruza@salud.madrid.org.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI22/01016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transitional period involves major cardiovascular adaptations that could affect cerebral perfusion. Combined multimodal monitoring (CMM) may provide a more comprehensive physiological assessment than individual monitoring modalities. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of CMM integrating near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE), and head ultrasound (HUS) during the transitional period in preterm infants ≤ 32 weeks' gestation and to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions following its implementation. Prospective observational cohort study. Participants underwent continuous NIRS and aEEG monitoring, two TNE assessment and one HUS during the first 72 h of life. Feasibility was defined as acquisition of ≥ 75% of intended NIRS and aEEG recording time, and completion of all imaging studies. Safety outcomes included TNE-related procedural intolerance and NIRS-related skin reactions. Healthcare professionals completed a post-implementation survey assessing acceptability and perceived clinical usefulness. Forty-seven infants were included. Overall CMM feasibility was 78.7%. Individual monitoring completion was 93.6% for NIRS, 95.7% for aEEG, 89.3% for TNE and 100% for HUS. Transient desaturations occurred in 7.9% of 89 TNE assessments, while mild NIRS-related erythema occurred in 11.3% of monitored infants. Healthcare professionals reported favorable perceptions of CMM, particularly regarding clinical relevance and complementarity with standard monitoring.

conclusionCMM was feasible and well tolerated during the first 72 h of life in preterm infants ≤ 32 weeks' gestation and was perceived favorably by healthcare professionals. Future studies are needed to explore its impact on clinically relevant outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The transitional period in preterm infants involves complex cardiovascular and cerebral adaptations associated with an increased risk of brain injury. • Individual monitoring modalities (NIRS, aEEG, TNE and HUS) provide complementary information on cardiovascular and cerebral physiology but are commonly assessed separately. WHAT IS NEW: • Structured CMM integrating NIRS, aEEG, TNE and HUS is feasible and well tolerated during the transitional period in preterm infants ≤ 32 weeks' gestation. • Healthcare professionals perceive CMM as clinically relevant and complementary to standard monitoring, supporting further evaluation of integrated multimodal assessment in neonatal care.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureEchocardiographyElectroencephalographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHeadHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUltrasonographyCombined multimodal monitoringFeasibilityNear-infrared spectroscopyNeonatal transitionPreterm infantsTargeted neonatal echocardiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.